
The barcode turned 30 years old
recently. Perhaps you missed the celebration.
Today we
think nothing of zipping merchandise with the familiar printed
patterns across scanners at self-service checkout kiosks and then
rapidly sliding our credit or debit cards through as means of
payment. It is amazing how quickly we take new, innovative
technology for granted.
However,
technological advances were not the first thoughts to come to mind
when hearing that the barcode had been around for three decades.
Best remembered from its introduction in 1974 are the warnings
from the fearful among the faithful.
Surely the
barcode was the Mark of Beast as foretold in Revelation, some
suggested. It would help bring about the promised and dreaded
one-world government. At the least, it was another clear sign that
the end of the world is near.
At the
time, most of us could not imagine that this strange ink pattern
would someday replace price tags, inventory takers and the need to
manually enter the cost of products into a cash register. But we
found it equally hard, if not harder, to believe that the innocent
little barcode had anything to do with the Second Coming.
In fact,
few of us made any connection at all between checkout lines and
eternity unless price tags were missing, the cashier was
incompetent or the person in line ahead of us couldn’t find their
wallet or checkbook.
Parents and
experience can be good teachers. Both can teach the value of a
healthy dose of suspicion.
Growing up
in the northwest corner of Georgia, our kitchen radio stayed tuned
to the same Chattanooga station from the time my mom arose early
to make breakfast until just about dinnertime. It was then that an
announcer would introduce, “The World Tomorrow with Garner Ted
Armstrong …”
CLICK. That
would be the end of radio listening until the next morning, unless
the Braves had a night game.
On occasion
I’d ask my mother why she cut off the radio so quickly after an
uninterrupted day of listening to local personalities like Luther
and Jolly Charlie, and such perky tunes as “Downtown” and “The
Chattanoogie Shoeshine Boy.”
She never
went into details, but expressed her doubts about this man’s
interpretations of the Bible and the end of the world. Dad agreed.
He was a
bit suspicious of most gospel music groups too. He said they tend
to bounce around the country entertaining folks without getting
involved in a local church and its broader mission like they
should.
Both
parents taught me that you don’t need formal theological training
to have a pretty good truth meter.
Experience
is another way to build healthy suspicion. However, not all people
learn from being snookered the first time.
Hal Lindsey
came on the scene about the same time as the barcode. He had many
of us trying to match the daily news with his advancing
eschatological timetable. And he sold a ton of books.
Recently I
saw the grayer and wider former tugboat captain turned
prognosticator on television still dispensing his predictions to
eager listeners. He spoke from a podium proclaiming, “On the Brink
of Rapture.”
There is
something attractive, I guess, about being part of an esoteric
group. But I gave up such pious puzzle solvers about 30 years ago
— along with my leisure suits and platform shoes.
There is
something about falling for the same trick twice that is
appropriately embarrassing.
However,
care must be taken to avoid an overdose of suspicion. The
resulting cynicism is no more productive to individuals and the
church than floundering naivety.
But a good
dose of healthy suspicion would serve most Christians well. It is
important to remember that Jesus calls his followers to childlike
faith, not gullibility.
The
challenge to be wise as serpents and gentle as doves can serve us
well in an age where discernment of truth is a challenging
responsibility.