
Not everyone can fully
appreciate the fine array of baseball promotional items displayed
in my basement. (That is why they are in the basement rather than
a more prominent location.)
These
freebies were given out as incentives at various baseball games
I’ve attended. The overall ballpark experience is enough of an
attraction to me, however. But I do enjoy the giveaways.
There is a
nice pair of Chicago Cubs sunglasses from an afternoon at Wrigley
Field and a Juan Gonzalez bobble-head doll from a spring evening
in Arlington, Texas. Perhaps my favorite, and certainly the most
unusual, is a salmon can filled with river pebbles to be used as a
noisemaker to cheer on the Anchorage Pirates.
You are a
long way from the majors when fans and players alike stand in
concession lines between innings for hot coffee on a cool Alaska
night.
However, I
missed the promotion this August when the Nashville Sounds hosted
the Memphis Redbirds and a local ministry provided 4,000 copies of
the Heart of the Outdoors Bible. The camouflage-covered NIV
Bible, according to a press release, is designed for hunting and
fishing enthusiasts.
It
reportedly contains adventure stories from noted sportsmen in
addition, I assume, to the rather adventurous stories already in
the Bible.
Southern
Baptists produced their own “Sportsman Version” of the Holmon
Christian Study Bible this year as well. Both the camo cover and
the pages are advertised as non-reflective. I assume this allows
for having the Word of God at hand while having the prey of choice
in sight.
Publishers
have gone all out in recent years to market the Bible to specific
audiences. Revolve: The Complete New Testament, from Thomas
Nelson Publishers, was one of the more controversial. The
biblical texts are presented in the format of a flashy teen
magazine with added guidelines for teenage girls on fashion and
dating.
Opinions
were split on whether this was a good thing. Some see relevance
where others see irreverence.
Ridicule is
not my purpose here. Rather it is to raise a question that
challenges church leaders in many areas of ministry today.
How do we
present the gospel in creative and contemporary ways that attract
the attention of modern society without compromising the biblical
message to the point that it accommodates rather than challenges
our cultural values?
There is
no need to scan down this page in hopes of finding an easy answer.
There is none.
It is
this crucial question — or more accurately, the varied answers --
that divides church leaders over worship styles, outreach tactics
and various other approaches to ministry.
Despite
the risk, however, this is a question that cannot be avoided.
Addressing the issue does not have to be divisive, even when
differing opinions are obvious.
The most
constructive first step is for all church leaders to acknowledge
the dilemma associated with seeking to stay true to the biblical
message while relating to an increasingly secular society — or at
least a society that does not buy into institutional church as
easily as past generations.
Figuring
out exactly how to do that is not easy. Some measure of
give-and-take as well as trial-and-error is required. It is much
easier to be a critic of what others are doing than to jump into
the muddiness in search of a solution or two.
Some
critics are resistant to anything that doesn’t look and feel
exactly like the church they have always known. Personal
preferences and comfort are their only means of evaluation. These
persons often lack creativity and stifle the creativity of others.
On the
other side, there are those who want to make the church so
attractive — and successful by cultural rather than biblical
standards — that they are willing to baptize self-indulgence and
existing prejudices in order to recruit. In turn, the whole idea
of conversion becomes lost. The church is big, fat and happy, but
lacks a prophetic voice.
Neither
of these options is viable. We are not closing deals. The church
must risk having its message rejected by those not attracted to
change, sacrifice and service.
Likewise, we must risk changing some familiar ways in which the
biblical message of grace and hope is articulated. To change the
way a message is delivered does not mean the essence of the
message must necessarily be changed.
Can we
go too far in trying to make the gospel attractive and relevant?
Sure.
It is when
the timeless message on the inside of the Bible is camouflaged.