
Cracks are forming in the Southern Baptist Convention wall.
Whether they lead to significant fractures or are easily patched
is not yet known.
Current debates over Calvinism, Landmarkism
and Charismatic practices might grow more divisive in days ahead,
but the more intense pressure point seems to be at the
generational divide. Some young SBC leaders — who enjoy the free
flow of electronic information — are challenging the old
fundamentalist guard that prefers shaping and controlling all
information going out to the pews.
It must be frustrating to those who now claim
the SBC mantle — and relish in doing their deeds in darkness — to
discover a generation that does not play by their rules. Those
rules, of course, are that if you show full allegiance to the
political agenda of current Southern Baptist leadership you might
get a piece of the action for yourself.
Questioning or dissent of any kind has been a
disqualifier.
The hot spot of this tension can be seen in
the SBC International Mission Board trustees and how recent
actions are playing out in cyberspace. A young Oklahoma pastor and
trustee, Wade Burleson, violated the unwritten rules of
fundamentalism — leading to new written rules against dissent
being put into place quickly — by offering an opposing opinion on
trustee decisions via a weblog. He also dared to point out the
clear violation of written rules by a caucus of fellow trustees
seeking to discredit IMB President Jerry Rankin.
Burleson received harsh treatment by his
fellow trustees — who now have chosen to silence him rather than
try to boot him out at the convention meeting this summer.
Although they can’t quite explain his violations clearly and
consistently, they don’t appreciate him challenging their ways of
doing things.
In response, some young SBCers are rallying
their troops to attend the SBC annual meeting in June in
Greensboro, N.C., to face down the old guard. Some are even
calling for supporting Burleson as a potential convention
president.
SBC leaders have not totally ignored the
younger leadership growing within the convention. Before retiring
as president of LifeWay Christian Resources last winter, Jimmy
Draper talked to and with many young pastors. Likewise, innovative
Atlanta-area pastor Bryant Wright is breaking the mold of the SBC
Pastors Conference that precedes the Greensboro meeting by giving
considerable attention to younger leadership.
Most troubling to those who wrestled the SBC
machinery away from more moderate-thinking Baptists decades ago —
at a time when young Baptist leaders of today were busy learning
to walk — is that their values and strategies will be at risk when
age finally forces them to loosen their grip and hand over the
reins.
For example, Mark Coppenger, who teaches
apologetics at Southern Seminary, wrote an opinion piece in the
March 21 edition of Baptist Press ripping popular writer Donald
Miller. I have seen Miller’s book, Blue Like Jazz, listed
as recommended reading on at least one web site of young SBCers.
Coppenger calls the book a “dreadful mess”
and discredits Miller in much of the same way he and others have
done fellow Baptists who do not share their angry, exclusive
approach to being Christian. He chides Miller for being critical
of fundamentalism in general and some Republican political
positions in particular — sure signs of being outside the approved
Southern Baptist perspective.
Also, Miller fails Coppenger’s orthodoxy text
by not denouncing homosexuality and abortion in strong enough
terms; not affirming the code word “inerrancy” when referring to
the Bible; and being “impatient with war metaphors” in the Bible.
Young SBC leaders should consider themselves
warned. If you want a place at the table, you better follow the
rules. Sound the right themes, don’t make waves and support the
powerbrokers if you want to become one. Otherwise, you better
bring enough votes to Greensboro this summer to take over the SBC
— again.