
Conviction and tolerance may not be mutually exclusive, but they
do require a difficult balancing act — especially for high-profile
public figures.
On one hand are those who see any kind of
religious conviction as intolerance or bigotry. The only
acceptable position to them is a declaration that all faith
traditions and expressions are equal.
To hold firm to the tenets of a particular
faith is considered disrespectful of other religious traditions.
That is sheer nonsense.
On the other hand, some religiously tenacious
people expect everyone from their dogcatcher to the president to
pass their religious test for office. That is ridiculous too.
Politicians seem to have a particularly
difficult time with these two extremely polar perspectives. They
want their religiously motivated constituency (with whom they
share faith commitments) to identify with them while still
attracting votes from those from a different faith tradition or
none at all.
Texas Gov.
Rick Perry felt that squeeze when attending an always-dangerous
“God and Country” service at John Hagee’s Cornerstone Church in
San Antonio.
At the conclusion of Hagee’s brimstone
sermon, a reporter asked the governor if he agreed with the fiery
pulpiteer’s assertion that all non-Christians go to hell.
According to a Dallas Morning News account, Gov. Perry said
he did.
“In my faith, that’s what it says, and I’m a
believer of that,” the conservative Christian governor replied.
Now, those of us with deep experiences in
Baptist churches know that such an answer is as expected in
conservative Christian circles as saying yes to a second helping
of chicken. There should be no surprise here.
However, the right follow-up question for those like Gov. Perry,
who serve and represent a broadly-diverse constituency, is: Can
you hold tightly to your own faith convictions and still be
respectful and tolerant of those who hold equally-deep faith
convictions that are different?
The answer, of course, is one
certainly can be highly convictional and widely gracious at the
same time. Christian conviction must always be teamed with
humility, respect and kindness.
Particularly for government leaders
in the United States, however, the guarantee of religious liberty
for all should be constantly reaffirmed.
Melissa Rogers, director of the
Center for Religion and Public Affairs at Wake Forest University,
during the T.B. Maston Lectures at Hardin-Simmons University’s
Logsdon Seminary, said it succinctly and well: “In short, one does
not have to believe that all religions are equally true in order
to believe that the government ought to treat all religions
equally.”
As expected, Gov. Perry sought to
soften his comments at a political rally later by offering this
clarification: “I don’t know that there’s any human being that has
the ability to interpret what God and his final decision making is
going to be.”
He probably wishes he had included
that along with his first statement at the church. But no one
should be condemned for holding faith convictions unless those
convictions lead them to violate the principles of justice and
equality essential to fulfilling one’s job.
And, on a personal level, even those
of us who are not political leaders must learn to live and work in
a more pluralistic society than most of us have encountered
before. To do so requires not seeing our personal faith
convictions and the acceptance of other persons with differing
viewpoints as being mutually exclusive.
In fact, Jesus taught a whole lot
about what we are to believe and how we are to
behave.