Baltimore, in the racially charged and
challenging days of the early ‘60s, is the setting for the musical
Hairspray. In the 2007 movie version, Nikki Blonsky plays
the main character, Tracy Turnblad— a chubby young white girl with
good dance moves and a strong social conscience.
She is expressing her idealism about racial
equality and interaction when African-American actress Queen
Latifah’s character, Motormouth Maybelle, responds: “Have you been
dozing off during history?”
It is a question that has frequent
application. We often encounter words or actions that suggest a
need to look backward before moving ahead.
As Baptists, we have reached a significant
historical milestone as various groups within our denomination
celebrate four centuries of a spiritual movement that began in
obscurity and resistance before growing into prominence and
influence.
Yet, too often, Baptists — including many in
significant leadership roles — seem to have dozed off during
history.
Various celebrations are being held this year
in recognition of the 400th anniversary of the
worldwide movement that most church historians trace back to a
small band of believers who dissented against control by church
authorities. The group, led by formative Baptist leaders John
Smyth and Thomas Helwys, organized in Amsterdam in 1609 what many
consider to be the first Baptist congregation.
All Baptists would do well to attend one of
the many events throughout the nation and world that spotlight
this occasion. Or, at the least, to read one of the many excellent
books about those who shaped the Baptist movement.
While at high risk of offending many friends
who have also written excellent and relevant books on Baptist
history, let me suggest just a few: Portraits of Courage,
by Julie Whidden Long, The Story of Baptists in the United
States by Pamela and Keith Durso, and Roger Williams by
Edwin Gaustad.
Many good biographies of early Baptists like
Smyth, Helwys, William Carey, Andrew Fuller, Luther Rice, Adoniram
and Ann Hasseltine Judson, and John Leland are enlightening. And
the broader Baptist history picture is well painted by the good
works of Baptist historians Walter Shurden, Bill Leonard, Leon
McBeth, William Brackney, Charles Deweese, Robert Gardner, Jesse
Fletcher and Doug Weaver — among many.
The Internet is full of resources as well
with good starting places being:
baptisthistory.org,
centerforbaptiststudies.org,
baptistheritage.org,
abhsarchives.org and
whitsittbaptist.org.
This anniversary year is a good time to pay
closer attention to the people, places, causes and conditions in
which our deep convictions and unique approach to faith and
practice developed. Even a casual familiarity with our Baptist
past will reinforce an understanding about those principles for
which Baptists have long stood and even died.
Our history reveals to us a profound
commitment to freely-chosen/non-coercive faith, non-hierarchal
denominational structures with voluntary cooperation, equal and
individual access to God and Scripture, unfettered congregational
autonomy, and full religious liberty for all persons while seeking
no special governmental favors.
It is the thread of freedom — for individual
conscience and congregational direction — that is woven throughout
the 400-year quilt of the Baptist movement. It is a unique
tradition that values dissent.
Speaking to the First Baptist Church of
Bennington, Vt., recently, American Baptist leader Roy Medley
shared the story of Joanna P. Moore, a
white Baptist in the 1800s who was denied appointment by the
American Baptist Home Mission Society to work with newly freed
slaves. But she would not be stopped, and formed the Women’s Home
Mission Society to carry out her calling.
“Like any good Baptist, she ignored the
church authorities of her day, and she plowed ahead,” Medley
shared with the congregation, according to the Bennington
Banner newspaper.
Can you imagine any other faith tradition in
which a denominational leader publicly celebrates dissent against
church authority and identifies such action as the defining norm?
No. Baptists, only Baptists, would do that.
Being marked by such freedom is risky. But
the historic Baptist understanding of this prized principle does
not suggest reckless freedom — but rather responsible freedom
where the individual person is responsible for relating to God and
the individual congregation is responsible for charting its course
of ministry.
This is no time to be dozing off.